SC-COA-01

    COA Analysis Engine

    RL + Bayesian + Monte Carlo course-of-action exploration.

    Doctrine alignment
    NATO COPD / Comprehensive Operations Planning Directive aligned.
    Deployment
    Scales horizontally; supports federated runs across allied nodes.
    Underlying products
    SynapseMesh™QuantumProof Protocol™
    01

    Purpose

    Course-of-action comparison too often rests on a single staff estimate and a spreadsheet, leaving commanders without a clear view of where assumptions break. SC-COA-01 generates and evaluates courses of action across a high-dimensional outcome space using reinforcement learning, Bayesian causal networks and Monte Carlo simulation in parallel. Agreement between methods raises confidence; disagreement is reported as a finding in its own right. Ranking criteria are explicit and commander-adjustable, source records stay at the originating node, and the complete run is sealed to CyberFort Blockchain so any ranking can be re-derived later.

    Command centre staff comparing candidate courses of action
    Course-of-action comparison
    02

    Architecture

    Mission objectives, constraints, ROE and the current red and blue postures define the outcome space. The engine explores it with three complementary methods run in parallel: reinforcement learning for policy discovery, Bayesian networks for causal structure, and Monte Carlo simulation for outcome distributions. Agreement between methods raises confidence; disagreement is reported as a finding in its own right. Ranking criteria are explicit and commander-adjustable, and every ranked COA carries its full sensitivity analysis. The engine scales horizontally and supports federated runs across allied nodes, with source records staying at the originating node. The complete run, including seeds and parameters, is sealed to CyberFort Blockchain so any ranking can be re-derived.

    IngestMission objectives · Constraints and ROERed and blue posturesReasoning coreReinforcement learning · Bayesian causal networksMonte Carlo outcome distributionsPolicy & assuranceExplicit, commander-adjustable ranking criteriaSource records stay at the originating nodeOutput & provenanceRanked COAs with sensitivity analysisSeeds and parameters sealedAny ranking re-derivable

    Hover or focus a band to see what it guarantees.

    03

    Inputs and outputs

    Typical inputs
    • IN-01Mission objectives
    • IN-02Constraints & ROE
    • IN-03Red & Blue postures
    Outputs
    • OUT-01Ranked COAs
    • OUT-02Risk distributions
    • OUT-03Sensitivity analysis
    05

    What it does not do

    It does not select a COA. It ranks, explains and waits.

    06

    The same four gates as every agent

    Fail-closed model register

    An unregistered or unapproved model tag is refused before inference, not flagged afterwards.

    Five-role RBAC

    Every action is scoped to a declared role. Scope is checked at the engine, not in the prompt.

    Supervised quarantine

    New or changed models run under supervision until their evaluation evidence is accepted.

    Human-on-the-loop

    Irreversible decisions require a signed human authorisation recorded with the decision.

    The agents differ in what they reason about. They do not differ in what they are allowed to do.

    07

    Deployment

    Sovereign Cloud

    In-country, accredited cloud, under your jurisdiction and operational control.

    Applicable
    On-Premises Classified

    Designed for deployment up to NATO SECRET. Accreditation is per deployment.

    Applicable
    Air-Gapped Tactical

    Runs disconnected. Inference, agents and the decision record are all local.

    Applicable

    Ready to see SynapseCommand® in action?

    Briefings available under NDA. Classified briefings arranged through cleared channels.